Ok, so the democratic platform is supporting gay rights, do we know what Romney supports? Do you believe that if he was in power the gays and their money would not be able to whip them into supporting that faction? For example, Romney once said he was pro-life, then he said he is pro-choice, now he is pro…I am not sure what. The reason for his flippant behavior was because he was trying to appease his audience. This is what they all do!
My point is this, I completely disagree with both party’s moral meter but like a commentator provided, we cannot expect these leaders to be the moral example for the church. The church is required to be the light. Accordingly, we need to fix our house. We need to clean up our act. Live a Christian life, one that is pleasing to God, not man. That is our liberty, we please God, not man, and should be willing to die for that. How much of us are willing to say this?
Politics change leaders and their views all the time. if a leader desires to be kept in their position, it is normally the group that screams the loudest and spends the most that the leader will have to support. Apart from the gays, look at how DACA was instituted. if those Dreamers weren’t pushing and raising money, the little appeasement that they have received would not have been granted.
So my approach is that it doesn’t matter which party is in power, gay rights would have become a big thing and the president (whomever it is) would have to buckle if he or she wants a second term. Therefore, to make my decision on who to support, I need to look on policies that will affect our standard of living. No one will be able to rise up and help out if we are all suffering. So which party has a plan, not just economic, but an overall plan, that will encourage life not survival.
Life, not in a shallow, economical sense, but life where peace is not a thing of the past.